Micromax A110 vs iBall Andi 4.5H: This is a comparison of two smartphones manufactured by two India based vendors. Micromax already has established itself in the industry while iBall is a well known brand in computer peripheral industry. Andi 4.5H is the best smartphone they have brought to market. Therefore, the competition is hard as both these handsets are supplied good quality hardware for optimum performance.
Both these smartphones are built on Android 4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich platform and powered by dual core processor. MediaTek MT6577 SoC that couples two Cortex A9 processor cores clocked at 1 GHz and PowerVR SGX531T GPU is used to power the handsets. Therefore, both ensures similar performance. But RAM is bumped to 1 GB while Micromax A110 negotiates with 512 MB RAM. RAM is a much needed parameter for better performance.
Micromax A110 vs iBall Andi 4.5H
In naked eye you can say iBall Andi 4.5H promises best performance between the duos. Let’s take a look at the benchmark scores-
Micromax A110 vs iBall Andi 4.5H Benchmark Scores
Let’s start the comparison with benchmark scores first followed by analysis-
| Benchmark Tests | Micromax A110 | iBall Andi 4.5H |
| Quadrant | 2680 | 2651 |
| Nenamark | 25.4 fps | 23.8 fps |
| Antutu | 4970 | 6562 |
| Multi-touch | 5 | 5 |
You can see Micromax A110 is doing better in Quadrant and Nenamark 2 benchmark results but in Antutu benchmark iBall Andi 4.5H beats the Micromax phablet by a fair margin. Therefore, there is not much of difference in benchmark results although in naked eye iBall Andi 4.5H is no doubt the winner here just because of 1 GB RAM.
Micromax A110 vs iBall Andi 4.5H Performance Comparison
Powered by Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich both these smartphones are using MediaTek MT6577 SoC which is best suitable SoC for affordable smartphones. Along with processor and GPU RAM is very important for fast multitasking and better gaming. Actually, RAM is a volatile memory where CPU temporarily stores required portion of a process for faster reading. RAM is way faster than SD or storage. The more the amount of RAM is the better the processing speed. CPU at a time can run plenty of applications without any lag. Therefore, theoretically iBall Andi 4.5H is better than Micromax A110.
Micromax A110 vs iBall Andi 4.5H
| Micromax A110 | iBall Andi 4.5H | winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating System | Android 4.0.4 ICS | Android 4.0.4 ICS | Tied |
| Performance | MediaTek MT6577, Dual 1 GHz Cortex A9, PowerVR SGX531 GPU, 512 MB RAM | MediaTek MT6577, Dual 1 GHz Cortex A9, PowerVR SGX531 GPU, 1 GB RAM | Andi 4.5H |
| Display Type | IPS LCD, 480×854 pixels resolution | IPS LCD, 540×960 pixels resolution | Andi 4.5H |
| Display Size | 5 inch | 4.5 inch | A110 |
| Sensors | G-sensor, proximity | G-sensor, proximity, light sensor | Andi 4.5H |
| Storage | 4 GB, micro SD card support 32 GB | 4 GB, micro SD card support 32 GB | Tied |
| Camera | 8 MP rear, LED flash, auto focus, front camera VGA | 8 MP rear, LED flash, auto focus, front camera VGA | Tied |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, micro USB 2.0, USB OTG | Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, micro USB 2.0 | Tied |
| Speed | GPRS/EDGE Class, 3G speed 7.2 Mbps HSDPA | GPRS/EDGE Class, 3G speed 7.2 Mbps HSDPA | Tied |
| Battery | 2000 mAh | 1600 mAh | A110 |
| Music, Video Player | Yes, no Sound Enhancement | Yes, no Sound Enhancement | Tied |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes | Tied |
| SIM Card | Dual Standby | Dual Standby | Tied |
Micromax A110 vs iBall Andi 4.5H: Final Words
Well, in overall comparison there is not much of difference. RAM is increased to 1 GB in iBall Andi 4.5H which makes some sense here. It runs heavy applications better than Micromax A110. Both are built around same OS and SoC. There is nothing to differentiate the duos. In camera segment once again the handsets are close to each other. Bigger display size of Micromax A110 is advantageous to many while this is a kind of drawback for you if you are not accustomed with a giant size smartphone. In that case, iBall Andi 4.5H is more compact. bigger battery is required for bigger display. Therefore, you can expect similar hours of usage from these handsets. Huge community, availability of ROMs make Micromax A110 Canvas 2 really a hard competitor to beat. Cost of Andi 4.5H is Rs. 12,490 whereas Micromax A110 costs Rs. 9999. Though there is some visible difference in price you can see Andi is supplied more RAM that claims the additional amount. Now choice is yours.
About Manidip
hey mandip wt u say abt Videocon A30.
It has a 4 inch display with dual core procesor and 5MP HD camera.
ANTUTU- 6092
NINAMARK 2 – 44 FPS
Quadrant – 2437
5 point multi touch.
PLS REVIEW DIS PRODUCT
hey mandip…hi..
pls solve this confusion..
pls tell me if USB OTG feture is available with the below phones..because i want this feature anyhow..
Karbonn a9 plus
karbonn a21
andi 4.5h
karbonn s1 titaneum
hi..
pls tell me the android phones under 11 k with good camera, dual core processor , and USB OTG feature
Do you like Micromax A110 Canvas 2? Otherwise wait for Xolo X500. It has Intel processor inside. Karbonn A21, Xolo A700 are also good. In this price segment no good quality camera phone is available. All are pretty much the same.
hey mandip…hi..
pls solve this confusion..
pls tell me if USB OTG feture is available with the below phones..because i want this feature anyhow..
Karbonn a9 plus
karbonn a21
andi 4.5h
karbonn s1 titaneum